Will Studios' Ban on
Oscar Voters' DVDs Mean RAZZIE Screeners Instead??
by Head RAZZberry JOHN WILSON
In a controversial decision, the MPAA has announced that in its
efforts to prevent movie piracy, it has negotiated an agreement
among all the major Hollywood studios to ban the dissemination of
"screener" tapes and DVDs of this year's expected Oscar
contenders.
While so-called "Academy Screeners" are covered by this
new arrangement, it was unclear at press time whether or not
screeners of likely RAZZIE contenders might also be covered. In
the past, G.R.A.F. voters have had to rely on pay-per-view
showings and/or local video store rentals to determine whether Madonna
or J. Lo ranked as The Year's Worst Actress. But with
studios prohibited from sending tapes and DVDs to AMPAS members,
it is now possible that, to maintain any Awards momentum they
can, studios might turn instead to sending out screeners of such
likely Worst Picture nominees as FREDDY vs. JASON, LARA
CROFT: CRADLE OF LIFE, and, of course, GIGLI. Since the new
MPAA ban does not apply to titles already on video at the time
award voters are determining nominees and winners, it will not
affect such Rushed-to-Video titles as DADDY DAY CARE, CHARLIE'S
ANGELS: FULL THROTTLE and the other big RAZZIE Title of
2003, FROM JUSTIN TO KELLY.
To clarify his Foundation's take on the matter, RAZZIE Founder John
Wilson declared: "We welcome the kind of pandering,
vote-buying tactics that have always personified the REAL awards
shows. So far, the only perk of being a RAZZIE Member has been
knowing that we dishonored only the MOST deserving. If we start
getting wined-and-dined by Tinsel Town big shots, it's suddenly a
whole new ballgame. We of course welcome any tools the studios
can provide in helping our members determine which of 2003's
bumper crop of crappy movies actually is The Very
Worst."
MPAA President and spokesman Jack Valenti, who like most
of Hollywood's biggest names, refuses to even acknowledge the
existence of the RAZZIE Awards, did not return calls for comment.
Over-exposed, media-phobic 2003 Worst Actress front-runner Jennifer Lopez was also not available to discuss the
decision's possible impact on her award chances. Likely Worst
Actress co-nominee Kelly Clarkson, who has reached the
14 minute point in her 15 minutes of fame, was also unwilling to speak on record.