The Official RAZZIE® Forum : ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It!

The Official RAZZIE® Forum : ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : FOOL'S GOLD : ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! Thu, 23 May 2013 21:54:09 +0000 Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:03:38 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 360 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=2500 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : Actually,there's a forum... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=28911#28911 Author: Vits
Subject: 2500
Posted: February 08 2010 at 3:03pm

Actually,there's a forum for that.This one is for this movie,and for the awards it won or should have.]]> Mon, 08 Feb 2010 15:03:38 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=28911#28911 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : I'm just saying, it's... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=28903#28903 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 2500
Posted: February 08 2010 at 2:04pm

I'm just saying, it's not worth bringing up, since it's been over a year since it was released and it didn't win any Razzies. We should be focusing on what's up for Razzies this year.]]> Mon, 08 Feb 2010 14:04:32 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=28903#28903 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn Originally... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=28895#28895 Author: Vits
Subject: 2500
Posted: February 08 2010 at 1:53pm

Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

Originally posted by Vits

Have we really come to this?Hatin'movie just because Matthew is shirtless the entire time(if there are other reasons,that's the main one)?

Considering it didn't win anything, there really isn't much "hate" on it.

What are you talkin'bout?A movie's failure isn't just messured on how many Razzies it won,just like a movie's success isn't just messured on how many Oscars it won.

I don't know how it did at the box office,but I know it had bad reviews,and in a lot of'em I read "It sucks'cuz Matthew is shirtless the entire time",and tons of those were written by experts.

]]> Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:53:14 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=28895#28895 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : Originally posted by VitsHave... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=28884#28884 Author: BurnHollywoodBurn
Subject: 2500
Posted: February 08 2010 at 1:29pm

Originally posted by Vits

Have we really come to this?Hatin'movie just because Matthew is shirtless the entire time(if there are other reasons,that's the main one)?

Considering it didn't win anything, there really isn't much "hate" on it.

]]> Mon, 08 Feb 2010 13:29:50 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=28884#28884 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : Have we really come to this?Hatin'movie... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=28875#28875 Author: Vits
Subject: 2500
Posted: February 08 2010 at 10:18am

Have we really come to this?Hatin'movie just because Matthew is shirtless the entire time(if there are other reasons,that's the main one)?]]> Mon, 08 Feb 2010 10:18:31 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=28875#28875 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : Were flying! Yep! How do we... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=23184#23184 Author: Pete
Subject: 2500
Posted: May 08 2009 at 3:51am

Were flying!

Yep!

How do we get out of this trainwreck?

Yep!

]]> Fri, 08 May 2009 03:51:35 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=23184#23184 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : Kate Hudson was good in this!... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=20392#20392 Author: wolfee37
Subject: 2500
Posted: January 14 2009 at 4:45pm

Kate Hudson was good in this! But Donald Sutherland and the girl who plays his daughter totally deserve their nominations! You guys better not forget about them, or I will have to create my own razzies cause you guys alawys snub the real deserving ones :P ]]> Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:45:55 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=20392#20392 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : No doubt along with whatever poor... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=19120#19120 Author: wetbandit82
Subject: 2500
Posted: November 23 2008 at 3:44pm

No doubt along with whatever poor saps they tap to play the albino hitman (with our luck probably Eddie Murphy trying a desperate, laughable attempt to recreate his classic SNL "becoming a white guy" routine) and the midget bible salesman (perhaps a cameo for Chevy, digitally shrunk to midget proportions to "ironically" no doubt reflect how he feels about himself at the moment).

]]> Sun, 23 Nov 2008 15:44:19 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=19120#19120 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : I can't decide who's... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=18833#18833 Author: movieman
Subject: 2500
Posted: November 09 2008 at 4:21am

I can't decide who's worse in the movie, Kate Hudson or Matthew
McConaughey, but it is for sure that Kate Hudson will receive a four-way
Worst Screen couple nomination with Matthew McConaughey, Dane Cook,
and Jason Biggs from My Best
Friends Girl.]]> Sun, 09 Nov 2008 04:21:40 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=18833#18833 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : The only categories this film... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=18832#18832 Author: MiguelAntilsu
Subject: 2500
Posted: November 08 2008 at 5:44pm

The only categories this film has a shot for are Worst Screen Couple (Matthew McConaughey and Kate Hudson) and possibly Worst Actress (Kate Hudson).

]]> Sat, 08 Nov 2008 17:44:35 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=18832#18832 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : Originally posted by cvcjr13Tim... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=17985#17985 Author: movieman
Subject: 2500
Posted: September 08 2008 at 12:52pm

Originally posted by cvcjr13

Tim Allen. Why not? The movie is a bust from the get
go. Might as well throw bad money after bad. . . .

Tim Allen is facing what Robin Williams is; both are pretty funny comedians,
but a lot of their movies don't reflect that.
]]> Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:52:28 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=17985#17985 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : Or, if you want to go with totally... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=17120#17120 Author: Michaels
Subject: 2500
Posted: July 10 2008 at 4:06pm

Or, if you want to go with totally talentless and unfunny: Dane Cook.

Originally posted by cvcjr13

Tim Allen. Why not? The movie is a bust from the get-go. Might as well throw bad money after bad. . . .

]]> Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:06:40 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=17120#17120 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : Tim Allen. Why not? The movie... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=17079#17079 Author: cvcjr13
Subject: 2500
Posted: July 08 2008 at 5:14pm

Tim Allen. Why not? The movie is a bust from the get-go. Might as well throw bad money after bad. . . . ]]> Tue, 08 Jul 2008 17:14:10 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=17079#17079 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry:... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=17008#17008 Author: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: 2500
Posted: July 04 2008 at 3:11am

RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry: "Ironically," nothing -- If indeed this project is "in the works," it's probably because of the idea of having Hudson re-create one of her mother's most popular roles. As for having McConaughey replace Chevy Chase -- I have yet to see any evidence that he has any comedic abilities. And for those who remember the original FOUL PLAY, just who are they thinking could play the film's third major role, which played a major part in elevating Dudley Moore to stardom three decades ago???

]]> Fri, 04 Jul 2008 03:11:56 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=17008#17008 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : This is even worse. Kate Hudson... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=17004#17004 Author: Michaels
Subject: 2500
Posted: July 03 2008 at 2:35pm

This is even worse.

Kate Hudson and Matthew McConaughey are planning another movie together - a remake of Foul Play.

Ironically, Hudson's mother Goldie Hawn starred in the original 1978 comedy.

Hudson and McConaughey have played lovers in Fool's Gold and How To Lose A Guy in 10 Days.

The actress confirms negotiations have started about the new film project, but "we don't even have a writer yet".

That writer has big trouble on his hands. And since when are Hudson and McConaughey the new Tom Hanks and Meg Ryan?

]]> Thu, 03 Jul 2008 14:35:09 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=17004#17004 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : Any movie that depends on its... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=16941#16941 Author: Michaels
Subject: 2500
Posted: July 01 2008 at 12:56pm

Any movie that depends on its stars running around shirtless or in bikinis is doomed. Just because it worked for "Baywatch", doesn't mean it works for major motion pictures.]]> Tue, 01 Jul 2008 12:56:01 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=16941#16941 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : This movie was so stupid. The... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=16914#16914 Author: myworksucks
Subject: 2500
Posted: June 30 2008 at 4:11am

This movie was so stupid. The jokes fell flat and not even the shot of a shirtless Matt M could save this stinker.]]> Mon, 30 Jun 2008 04:11:33 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=16914#16914 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : Yeah, this movie was marketed... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=16854#16854 Author: moviewizguy
Subject: 2500
Posted: June 27 2008 at 4:22am

Yeah, this movie was marketed a a comedy but it was actually an action/adventure. I was surprised by the huge amounts of blood and violence (compared to other PG-13 movies). But I thought the daughter was actually pretty funny...

]]> Fri, 27 Jun 2008 04:22:24 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=16854#16854 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : Damn this movie was AWFUL! Matt... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=16850#16850 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: 2500
Posted: June 26 2008 at 2:55pm

Damn this movie was AWFUL! Matt and Kate were awful, Donald Sutherland was miscast, and the b*tch who played his daughter DESERVES a Worst Supporting Actress win. For a film marketed as a light comedy, there was a large amount of blood. Matt shoots a man's ear off, Ray Winstone gets a harpoon to leg, explosions happen in close proximity to human beings, and when the main bad guy is stuck in a geyser, (SPOILER!) the geyser shoots a stream of blood and a flipper. To anyone that called "10,000 B.C." stupid needs to watch this and they will think that film was brilliant. This film defies multiple laws of physics. Guns at the bottom of the ocean work just fine (this gets worse when you remember Hollywood knows this doesn't work; the had jokes about wet clips not working in "Pirates Of The Carribean: At Word's End" and "Shoot'Em Up"), when Winstone gets the harpoon to the leg, with exception of a pissy look on his face, he just keeps going after the guy who shoot at him, Matt doesn't appear unfaced after getting launched up into the air by an explosion, and wouldn't body parts come out of the geyser as well? Nominees: Worst Picture, Director, Actor, Actress, Supporting Actor, Supporting Actress, Screenplay, Screen Couple, and Rip-Off (of "The Deep", "National Treasure", "Romancing The Stone", and "Sahara").]]> Thu, 26 Jun 2008 14:55:43 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=16850#16850 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : I just watched this movie from... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=16751#16751 Author: movieman
Subject: 2500
Posted: June 20 2008 at 2:48pm

I just watched this movie from Netflix; it was ok, wasn't horrible, but wasn't
the best either, and I can see where people are coming from when they point
out the movie's flaws...]]> Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:48:11 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=16751#16751 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : What a waste of good talent like... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=16113#16113 Author: mmscheema
Subject: 2500
Posted: April 21 2008 at 1:16pm

What a waste of good talent like Matthew McConaguey. Looked like an awful rehash of a number of good movies.

]]> Mon, 21 Apr 2008 13:16:52 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=16113#16113 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : I actually did pay to this awful... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=15466#15466 Author: bts228
Subject: 2500
Posted: February 13 2008 at 11:37am

I actually did pay to this awful piece of sh*t. Everything about it was terrible.
But a special RAZZIE needs to go to Alexis Dziena for Worst Supporting
Actress. This was possibly the worst acting I've ever seen on screen. This
bitch was f**king someone.]]> Wed, 13 Feb 2008 11:37:36 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=15466#15466 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : "Come on, you know you're... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=15411#15411 Author: wetbandit82
Subject: 2500
Posted: February 07 2008 at 11:41am

"Come on, you know you're not going to hit me." WHACK. No, it doesn't work. You usually need some semblence of subtlety for this sort of story to work (Romancing the Stone did, and made the characters three dimensional as well), and it clearly has none of that. ]]> Thu, 07 Feb 2008 11:41:48 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=15411#15411 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : I actually think that this looks... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=15405#15405 Author: jb razz
Subject: 2500
Posted: February 06 2008 at 11:45pm

I actually think that this looks like a fun movie, though I agree that the two
main characters probably get annoying after a while. Plus it has Donald
Sutherland and Ray Winstone in what look like fun supporting roles, though
they may end up being the only good part of the movie.]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2008 23:45:46 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=15405#15405 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : Originally posted by saturnwatcherThis... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=15402#15402 Author: ITbeast
Subject: 2500
Posted: February 06 2008 at 1:11pm

Originally posted by saturnwatcher

This looks like a dead on remake of Romancing the Stone which airs almost daily on one or another of the Turner networks. Once again, originality is no where to be found.

Yeah, Looks like another "Pay Check" of the week movie for both Kate and Matt, Got to keep up the lifestyle you know!

]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2008 13:11:34 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=15402#15402 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : I hated Failure to Launch but... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=15400#15400 Author: moviewizguy
Subject: 2500
Posted: February 06 2008 at 12:37pm

I hated Failure to Launch but I immensly enjoyed How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days. I don't know, people seem to not enjoy sitcom comedy in movies....probably because sitcoms are for tv (movies like Monster-in-Law, Duplex, How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days, etc...). I look forward to this film because I enjoy the duo coming back together, even though it has bad reviews.]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2008 12:37:17 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=15400#15400 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : Will this be as BAD as Failure... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=15398#15398 Author: yotypeocom
Subject: 2500
Posted: February 06 2008 at 9:25am

Will this be as BAD as Failure to Launch? now that was a weak, lame and shameless piece of CRAP! I hope this one at least is funny or ridiculous because even Sahara was at least entertaining. Matthew McConaguey is on a string of mess!]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2008 09:25:18 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=15398#15398 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : This looks like a dead on remake... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=15397#15397 Author: saturnwatcher
Subject: 2500
Posted: February 06 2008 at 9:17am

This looks like a dead on remake of Romancing the Stone which airs almost daily on one or another of the Turner networks. Once again, originality is no where to be found.]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2008 09:17:46 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=15397#15397 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : I liked "Sahara", but... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=15394#15394 Author: SchumacherH8ter
Subject: 2500
Posted: February 06 2008 at 8:00am

I liked "Sahara", but this will suck.]]> Wed, 06 Feb 2008 08:00:36 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=15394#15394 ...and Only FOOLS Will Pay 2 See It! : Hey! You guys remember SAHARA?Neither... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=15379#15379 Author: moat
Subject: 2500
Posted: February 05 2008 at 7:09pm

Hey! You guys remember SAHARA?

Neither do I.

]]> Tue, 05 Feb 2008 19:09:56 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2500&PID=15379#15379