The Official RAZZIE® Forum : Reviews on SORCERER'S APPENDIX http://www.razzies.com/forum/ This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE® Forum : SORCERER'S APPRENTICE : Reviews on SORCERER'S APPENDIX Fri, 24 May 2013 05:04:04 +0000 Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:54:30 +0000 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss Web Wiz Forums 9.70 360 www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=4451 The Official RAZZIE® Forum http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_images/RazzieLogo02.gif http://www.razzies.com/forum/ Reviews on SORCERER'S APPENDIX : R.T. gave it 42%:"It has... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4451&PID=40696#40696 Author: Vits
Subject: 4451
Posted: April 12 2011 at 12:54pm

R.T. gave it 42%:"It has a likable cast and loads of CGI spectacle,but for all but the least demanding viewers,it will be less than spellbinding".
 
Roger Ebert gave it **.5/****:"In place of a plot,there's a premise;in place of carefully crafted action,there are stupefying exercises in computer-generated imagery,and in place of an ending,there's a hook for the sequel and,if all goes well,a new franchise".
 
Peter Travers gave it */****:"Should be rated U for Untouched by Human Hands".
]]> Tue, 12 Apr 2011 12:54:30 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4451&PID=40696#40696 Reviews on SORCERER'S APPENDIX : This one looks unlikely... http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4451&PID=32839#32839 Author: HeadRAZZBerry
Subject: 4451
Posted: July 08 2010 at 7:40am

This one looks unlikely to conjure up even a handful of favorable reviews: Here's a MetaCritic LINK, and an R.T. LINK, to see just how far from "magical" the reviews are on SORCERER'S APPRENTICE...  ]]> Thu, 08 Jul 2010 07:40:50 +0000 http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4451&PID=32839#32839