<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="RSS_xslt_style.asp" version="1.0" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:WebWizForums="http://syndication.webwiz.co.uk/rss_namespace/">
 <channel>
  <title>The Official RAZZIE&#174; Forum : YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!?</title>
  <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/</link>
  <description>This is an XML content feed of; The Official RAZZIE&#174; Forum : PIRATES of the CAROB-BEAN #4                                                                                                                 : YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!?</description>
  <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jun 2013 15:44:43 +0000</pubDate>
  <lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 16:34:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
  <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
  <generator>Web Wiz Forums 9.70</generator>
  <ttl>360</ttl>
  <WebWizForums:feedURL>www.razzies.com/forum/RSS_post_feed.asp?TID=4266</WebWizForums:feedURL>
  
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? :  Originally posted by VheidGTAhater,...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41775#41775</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2611">Michaels</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 17 2011 at 4:34pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Vheid</strong></em><br /><br />GTAhater, It has now dropped to 40%, If it were to near the 35% (by having something like 36/37%) would you agree with it getting a forum?</td></tr></table> <DIV></DIV>It has a little over 40 reviews so far, almost 30 saying it's rotten. If this trend keeps up, I think it's safe to say that it's one of ours.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 16:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41775#41775</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? : GTAhater, It has now dropped to...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41762#41762</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9186">Vheid</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 17 2011 at 11:07am<br /><br />GTAhater, It has now dropped to 40%, If it were to near the 35% (by having something like 36/37%) would you agree with it getting a forum?]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 11:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41762#41762</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? :  Originally posted by GTAHater767Why...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41727#41727</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2611">Michaels</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 16 2011 at 12:58pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by GTAHater767</strong></em><br /><br />Why 50% instead of 35%? There are enough movies below 35% to take up all the nominations every year.&nbsp;If you&nbsp;would want a movie with 46% (merely below average) to get nominations, especially in lieu of a movie with maybe 26% (putting it generously), why? I'm asking because I've&nbsp;always been&nbsp;confused about that.</td></tr></table> <DIV></DIV>I don't know. I just see 50% as not good or bad, it's the half way point. So anything below 50% should be considered bad, in my opinion.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2011 12:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41727#41727</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? : Why 50% instead of 35%? There...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41696#41696</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8230">GTAHater767</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 14 2011 at 9:38pm<br /><br />Why 50% instead of 35%? There are enough movies below 35% to take up all the nominations every year.&nbsp;If you&nbsp;would want a movie with 46% (merely below average) to get nominations, especially in lieu of a movie with maybe 26% (putting it generously), why? I'm asking because I've&nbsp;always been&nbsp;confused about that.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 21:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41696#41696</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? : I wasn&amp;#039;t at all angry at...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41694#41694</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2611">Michaels</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 14 2011 at 9:08pm<br /><br />I wasn't at all angry at the "Ghosts Of Girlfriends' Past" over "Origins: Wolverine" thing, mostly because I saw "GOGP" as just another rehashing of "A Christmas Carol", and we all know how much Hollywood&nbsp;LOVES public domain material (they can rehash it every ten years ... or every 6 months!). I'll take a bad comic book movie over Hollywood reaching into it's bag of public domain tricks for the millionth time. For example: this year, I'd gladly see "X-Men: First Class" over the&nbsp;10 billionth adaptation of "The Three Musketeers", but that's just me.<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>As for RT, I don't care if 50% is considered "fresh", as far as I'm concerned, anything at 50% or below is up for Razzie grabs!</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 21:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41694#41694</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? : For May 1, 2009, how angry were...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41690#41690</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8230">GTAHater767</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 14 2011 at 5:29pm<br /><br />For May 1, 2009, how angry were you that <EM>Ghosts of Girlfriends Past</EM> got a forum here instead of <EM>Origins: Wolverine</EM>?<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>And on jumping ahead, if the reviews are below 15% approval, it's a shoe-in for something. For movies whose names everyone knows, if they get below 30% approval, it's usually a shoe-in for something, and if it gets a forum here, that 30% jumps to about 50%. Which is why I'm hoping <EM>On Stranger Tides</EM> won't get a forum here under current circumstances.</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 17:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41690#41690</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? :  Originally posted by Vits The...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41689#41689</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2611">Michaels</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 14 2011 at 4:53pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Vits</strong></em><br /><br /><DIV><SPAN style="FONT-SIZE: medium" ="Apple-style-span"><FONT face="'Courier New', Courier, mono" ="Apple-style-span">The original STAR WARS trilogy and the prequel trilogy are often considered separate series.The same with the X-MEN trilogy and the ORIGINS movies.But yeah,you're right.</FONT></SPAN></DIV></td></tr></table> <DIV></DIV>First of all, as much as I would like to cosider them separate series, the truth of the matter is that they are prequels, and they are part of the chronological events of the overall series, unlike reboots like Nolan's Batman movies or the upcoming Spider-Man reboot.&nbsp;Secondly, based on the order that they were filmed and released, they are the fourth installments of the series. And finally ... they just plan sucked!]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 16:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41689#41689</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? :   Originally posted by MichaelsPlus,...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41686#41686</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8803">Vits</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 14 2011 at 4:26pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Michaels</strong></em><br /><br />Plus, there's the ever haunting "curse of the fourth installment of the movie series", usually resulting with the worst installment of the series, ie. "Batman &amp; Robin", "Star Wars: Phantom Menace", "X-Men Origins: Wolverine",&nbsp;"Indiana Jones 4", etc.</td></tr></table><div><span ="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: medium;"><font ="Apple-style-span" face="'Courier New', Courier, mono">The original STAR WARS trilogy and the prequel trilogy are often considered separate series.The same with the X-MEN trilogy and the ORIGINS movies.But yeah,you're right.</font></span></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 16:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41686#41686</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? : You&amp;#039;re jumping a little ahead...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41681#41681</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2611">Michaels</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 14 2011 at 4:10pm<br /><br />You're jumping a little ahead of us, GTAHater. I only said "On Stranger Tides" should get its own forum ... not that it should be a shoe-in for Worst Picture (although maybe Worst Sequel).]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 16:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41681#41681</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? : That&amp;#039;s fine until it gets...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41680#41680</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8230">GTAHater767</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 14 2011 at 3:51pm<br /><br />That's fine until it gets nominated without deserving it&nbsp;simply because the voters knew its name. <EM>Drive Angry 3D</EM> was one thing. Less than half as many people knew about it. I still remember <EM>At World's End</EM>, <EM>Book of Secrets</EM>, and <EM>Transformers 1</EM> (I only dislike Revenge of the Fallen). There were many worse movies released in 2<FONT color=#ff0000>007 </FONT><FONT color=#000000>that deserved nominations, including <EM>Alvin &amp; the Chipmunks</EM>, <EM>Georgia Rule</EM>, <EM>Delta Farce</EM>, <EM>Resident Evil: Extinction</EM>, <EM>The Seeker: The Dark is Rising</EM>, <EM>The Comebacks</EM>, and even <EM>Saw IV</EM>. For all I know, <EM>On Stranger Tides</EM>, <EM>Scream 4</EM>, and <EM>Drive Angry 3D </EM>could rob a deserving movie like <EM>Just Go With It</EM> or <EM>Red Riding Hood</EM> of a nomination, and it wouldn't reflect the worst the film industry had to offer this year.</FONT>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 15:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41680#41680</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? : The reason whythis moviewould...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41679#41679</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2611">Michaels</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 14 2011 at 2:04pm<br /><br /><DIV></DIV>The reason why&nbsp;this movie&nbsp;would be Razzie worthy is because of descending quality of the series in the past. The&nbsp;original movie was great, with a developed story, likable characters, and clever dialogue, but then the sequels were painful because all they did was rely on rehashing scenes and lines from the first movie ... and also using a metric-ton of CGI. If they were already falling back on the&nbsp;original movie by the time of the FIRST sequel, what are they going to do with this THIRD sequel? Plus, there's the ever haunting "curse of the fourth installment of the movie series", usually resulting with the worst installment of the series, ie. "Batman &amp; Robin", "Star Wars: Phantom Menace", "X-Men Origins: Wolverine",&nbsp;"Indiana Jones 4", etc. In my opinion, this movie is worthy of its own forum. The worst that can happen is that we're proven wrong, it'll be among the&nbsp;1 out of 10 times that the Razzies are wrong in choosing a Worst Movie of the Weak.&nbsp;]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 14:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41679#41679</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? : I say no. I was afraid of sounding...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41672#41672</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8230">GTAHater767</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 14 2011 at 11:40am<br /><br />I say no. I was afraid of sounding like moviewizguy by saying this shouldn't be upgraded. I tend to look more at the reviews, while many others also focus on who the movies star and&nbsp;what the films remind them of. Personally, I like when movies with negative reviews are given the highest priority, because then the list of bad movies nominated come the following winter&nbsp;really are the worst the film industry has to offer.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 11:40:51 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41672#41672</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? :   Originally posted by GTAHater767So...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41664#41664</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9186">Vheid</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 14 2011 at 5:50am<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by GTAHater767</strong></em><br /><br />So we should&nbsp;wait until May 20&nbsp;before upgrading this to an official forum. I can't say if the reviews will descend, but as usual, if they do... *falters*</td></tr></table><br><br>The question is should this be upgraded to an official forum? It currently seems to be in the 60's on RT, It will probably descent to the low 50's or somewere in the 40's. Is that bad enough to give it a forum?<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2011 05:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41664#41664</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? : So we shouldwait until May 20before...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41622#41622</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8230">GTAHater767</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 12 2011 at 3:09pm<br /><br />So we should&nbsp;wait until May 20&nbsp;before upgrading this to an official forum. I can't say if the reviews will descend, but as usual, if they do... *falters*]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 15:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41622#41622</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? :    At 55% on Rotten Tomatoes...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41621#41621</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9186">Vheid</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 12 2011 at 2:32pm<br /><br /><p><a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/pirates_of_the_caribbean_&#111;n_stranger_tides/" target="_blank">At 55% on Rotten Tomatoes at the moment...</a></p>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2011 14:32:05 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41621#41621</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? : All I have to say is that &amp;#034;Pirates...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41522#41522</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=2611">Michaels</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 09 2011 at 4:08pm<br /><br />All I have to say is that "Pirates 5" is already in the works. Can't anyone wait to see if the movie is a success first? I think it was said best before elsewhere on the forum, every studio wants its "James Bond" series that lasts for 50 years!]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 16:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41522#41522</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? : Berrynoia, You know that the IMDB-rating...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41519#41519</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9186">Vheid</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 09 2011 at 3:06pm<br /><br /><p><strong>Berrynoia</strong>, You know that the IMDB-rating is worthless, mostly because the film hasn't been officially released yet and a lot of fans of the series probably gave it a ten without even seeing the movie yet.</p><p>But i'll probebly see this one on the big screen just like i did with the previous Pirates-films.</p>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 15:06:51 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41519#41519</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? : I can&amp;#039;t join the hate bandwagon...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41518#41518</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=618">Berrynoia</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> May 09 2011 at 2:58pm<br /><br />I can't join the hate bandwagon for Pirates Four...well at least not yet.&nbsp; I liked the movies, despite the latter's flaws, and need to wait and see if this new one will work out or truly nuke the fridge like Indy 4 did.<br><br>The IMDB users give <i>At World's End</i> a 7.0, which is lower than the other two PotC films, but still respectable.<br><br>And don't get started with my father.&nbsp; He is an addict.&nbsp; He frequently says "Thank you, Jack" in common situations, to the point it gets on my nerves, and "Aye, That be True" among other things.&nbsp; Yeah, he's obsessed.&nbsp; He probably will want to pay to see "On Stranger Tides" on an IMAX screen.<br><br>I also am aware of the hate.&nbsp; I remember the Simpsons episode "Apocalypse Cow" having Bart driving a combine harvester.&nbsp; He drives over straw, making bales of straw.&nbsp; He drives over water, making bales of water (which splash out). He drives over <b>manure</b>, and makes bales of "<b>Pirates of the Caribbean 3" DVDs</b>.<br><br>Still, I will keep watch, from RT and IMDB.&nbsp; I want to see how this plays out.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 09 May 2011 14:58:02 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=41518#41518</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? :  I know POTC at the worlds end...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=40800#40800</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9481">Kphilly</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> April 15 2011 at 5:53am<br /><br />I know POTC at the worlds end was pretty sh*tty but I am still looking forward to watching the new one, just because of Johnny Depp.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 05:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=40800#40800</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? : Why does everybody make such a...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=37908#37908</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9215">krios03grad</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> January 03 2011 at 11:44pm<br /><br />Why does everybody make such a big deal of Johnny Depp anyway? I liked the background layout of Alice in Wonderland but I just hated the storyline and the way the characters looked! Kind of pre-gayish don't you think and very confusing? The last good movie I saw with him in it was Edward Scissorhands! I don't mind that this movie gets 2 or 3 Razzies!]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 23:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=37908#37908</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? :  Originally posted by Grounder...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=37110#37110</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8839">BurnHollywoodBurn</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 17 2010 at 8:28am<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by Grounder the Critic</strong></em><br /><br />The new trailer is kinda good. I mean I can't wait, call me crazy, but I didn't like <I>At World's End, </I>that much.</td></tr></table> <DIV></DIV>You CRAZY! I kid, I kid. I understand it looks to be a fun and entertaining movie, I'm just saying it won't be a great movie by any means.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=37110#37110</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? : The new trailer is kinda good....</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=37098#37098</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9143">Grounder the Critic</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 17 2010 at 5:31am<br /><br />The new trailer is kinda good. I mean I can't wait, call me crazy, but I didn't like <i>At World's End, </i>that much.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:31:04 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=37098#37098</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? : Like I said, I saw the trailers,...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=37092#37092</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8839">BurnHollywoodBurn</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 16 2010 at 10:20pm<br /><br />Like I said, I saw the trailers, and I'm not impressed. They are using the same jokes that got old by the end of the first movie.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:20:14 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=37092#37092</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? :        WOW... horrible...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=36926#36926</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9186">Vheid</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> December 14 2010 at 12:08am<br /><br />WOW... horrible teaser <i>(first video)</i>.<br><br>The trailer <i>(second video)</i> is better but it also isn't really good.<br><br>Rob Marshall (director of Chicago/Nine) seems to be directing, strange choice.<br><br>&#091;TUBE&#093;XJNaTZAjyR4&#091;/TUBE&#093;<br><br>&#091;TUBE&#093;-B7bAaUyvXg&#091;/TUBE&#093;<br><br><br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 00:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=36926#36926</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? :   Originally posted by cvcjr13 MTV...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=36130#36130</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=9102">ziesha</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> November 16 2010 at 3:56am<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by cvcjr13</strong></em><br /><br /><a href="http://www.mtv.com/movies/news/articles/1634348/story.jhtml" target="_blank">MTV News announces</a> that Penelope Cruz will be Johnny Depp's love interest in <strong><em>PotC4</em></strong>.&nbsp; She'll play the daughter of Blackbeard, Captain Jack's nemesis.&nbsp; Geoffrey Rush will be back, too.&nbsp;&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>My question is, will it be as bad as <strong><em>At World's End<span style="font-weight: normal;">...</span></em></strong>or will it be even worse?&nbsp;<div></div></div><div><br></div><div><span style="font-size: large;"><font face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><b>RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry:</b> I found <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/pirates-of-the-caribbean-3-at-wits-end_forum197.html" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: large;"><font face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><font color="#000000">the third PIRATES movie</font></font></span></a> to be one of the most headache-inducing, impossible-to-follow, soul-numbing movie-going experiences of the last decade. So the prospect of a 4th installment fills me with both dread...and anticipation.</font></span></div></td></tr></table><br><br>yeah i do think so , in fact it was a heartache too because movie wasted mine so much of time.<br>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 03:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=36130#36130</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? :  Originally posted by saturnwatcherI...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=30501#30501</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8839">BurnHollywoodBurn</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> March 24 2010 at 4:47pm<br /><br /><table width="99%"><tr><td class="BBquote"><strong><em>Originally posted by saturnwatcher</strong></em><br /><br />I haven't even been on the <EM>ride</EM> four times in my life...why would I want to see 4 movies?</td></tr></table> <DIV></DIV>Actually, I think around the time of the second or third movie, they changed the ride so that it follows Jack Sparrow and a story that's closer to what's in the movies. So I guess you'll have to take the ride for a 5th time, saturnwatcher.<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV><DIV>But yeah, I don't know how you could get four movies out of a 15 minute ride with no storyline outside of a dog holding the keys to a jail cell and voices saying "dead men tell no tales".</DIV>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=30501#30501</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? : I haven&amp;#039;t even been on the...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=30500#30500</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=14">saturnwatcher</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> March 24 2010 at 4:40pm<br /><br />I haven't even been on the <EM>ride</EM> four times in my life...why would I want to see 4 movies?]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:40:31 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=30500#30500</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? : I was convinced On Stranger Tideswouldn&amp;#039;t...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=30456#30456</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8230">GTAHater767</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> March 23 2010 at 8:16am<br /><br />I was convinced On Stranger Tides&nbsp;wouldn't be released until 2011. At World's End, I thought was fair. Not great, not as bad as the RAZZIES say, but somewhere between average and decent.]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=30456#30456</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? : Well so long as the visual effects...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=30381#30381</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=8839">BurnHollywoodBurn</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> March 21 2010 at 6:24am<br /><br />Well so long as the visual effects aren't as bloated and overused and they don't keep mentioned "the rum is gone" every five seconds, it could be better than "AWE".]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 06:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=30381#30381</guid>
  </item> 
  <item>
   <title>YO, HO...HEAVE HO??!?!? :    MTV News announces that...</title>
   <link>http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=30379#30379</link>
   <description>
    <![CDATA[<strong>Author:</strong> <a href="http://www.razzies.com/forum/member_profile.asp?PF=708">cvcjr13</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> 4266<br /><strong>Posted:</strong> March 21 2010 at 3:05am<br /><br /><a href="http://www.mtv.com/movies/news/articles/1634348/story.jhtml" target="_blank">MTV News announces</a> that Penelope Cruz will be Johnny Depp's love interest in <strong><em>PotC4</em></strong>.&nbsp; She'll play the daughter of Blackbeard, Captain Jack's nemesis.&nbsp; Geoffrey Rush will be back, too.&nbsp;&nbsp;<div><br></div><div>My question is, will it be as bad as <strong><em>At World's End<span ="apple-style-span"="" style="font-weight: normal;">...</span></em></strong>or will it be even worse?&nbsp;<div></div></div><div><br></div><div><span ="apple-style-span"=""><font ="apple-style-span"="" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><b style="font-size: large; "><font ="apple-style-span"="" color="#cc0033">RESPONSE from Head RAZZberry:</font></b><font ="Apple-style-span" size="4"> I found <a href="http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/pirates_of_the_caribbean_3/" target="_blank"><font ="Apple-style-span" size="4" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif" color="#000000"><u>the third PIRATES movie</u></font></a></font><font ="Apple-style-span" size="4">&nbsp;to be one of the most headache-inducing, impossible-to-follow, soul-numbing movie-going experiences of the last decade. So the prospect of a 4th installment fills me with both dread...and anticipation! &nbsp;</font></font></span></div><div><span ="apple-style-span"="" style="font-size: large;"><font ="apple-style-span"="" face="'Times New Roman', Times, serif"><br></font></span></div>]]>
   </description>
   <pubDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 03:05:57 +0000</pubDate>
   <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.razzies.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4266&amp;PID=30379#30379</guid>
  </item> 
 </channel>
</rss>