Official RAZZIE® Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > 31st Annual RAZZIE® Award Nominees & "WINNERS" > VAMPIRES SUCK
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed: Given That It's Seltzerberg It's SURE to SUCK!!
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Calendar   Register Register  Login Login

Given That It's Seltzerberg It's SURE to SUCK!!
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 4567>
Author
Message
  Share Topic Share Topic  Topic Search Topic Search  Topic Options Topic Options
aqua mailman View Drop Down
Berry New Comer
Berry New Comer


Joined: September 01 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 15 		Post Options Post Options   Quote aqua mailman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Given That It's Seltzerberg It's SURE to SUCK!!
    Posted: December 03 2010 at 2:11pm
Okay, 3 mounths later and there are STILL Studio Shills on VS's IMDb page. Jesus Christ, just leave already! And you'd think they would make it less obvious that they are being handed cash every time they post, but nope. They are always telling me "Pleasantly Suprised" or "Does a Dead on Impression of KS."  Or How 'bout the ones that say "It's a parody! What were you expecting, High Art?"

No, to put it in the immortal words of Gaydolf Hitler (IMDb user) "If i were to consider the Garbage Pail Kids to be the Mona Lisa, then this film would be the crayon scribblings of a mentally insane  kindergartener who is blind." 

For once in my life, I agree with Hitler!  
Back to Top
TheMovieCritic View Drop Down
Berry New Comer
Berry New Comer


Joined: December 06 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 12 		Post Options Post Options   Quote TheMovieCritic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 06 2010 at 12:27pm
Take the title Vampires Suck as a sign to stay away from a movie that was destined to fail at the box office. Hopefully this is the last in this terrible "movie" parody series!  
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4824 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 06 2010 at 3:59pm
But didn't it do well at the box office??  
http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557 		Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 06 2010 at 7:56pm
Maybe... and, so? "Transformers 2" made nearly a billion dollars worldwide, but it still won 3 major Razzies. As the Movie Preview Critic says "Just because it's a hit, that doesn't mean it's not a piece of s***".
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4824 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 07 2010 at 4:06am
Originally posted by BurnHollywoodBurn

As the Movie Preview Critic says "Just because it's a hit, that doesn't mean it's not a piece of s***".
I know.But he said:
Originally posted by TheMovieCritic

Take the title Vampires Suck as a sign to stay away from a movie that was destined to fail at the box office.
http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com
Back to Top
TheMovieCritic View Drop Down
Berry New Comer
Berry New Comer


Joined: December 06 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 12 		Post Options Post Options   Quote TheMovieCritic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 07 2010 at 11:32am
The movie was not funny at all. I watched Jaws The Revenge a few weeks ago and was laughing more at its terrible effects and script compared to this piece of cinema junk which yielded no laughs from me what so ever.
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557 		Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 08 2010 at 8:56am
Yeah, it's kinda sad when "accidental comedies" are funnier than movies that are supposed to be "actual" comedies.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Areyouserious? View Drop Down
Berry New Comer
Berry New Comer


Joined: September 17 2010
Location: ...
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 14 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Areyouserious? Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 22 2010 at 4:58am
By the looks of it, "Seltzerberg" are scared someone will figure them out. They "tried" to hide the production of this, there was no premiere ( I'm sure for the sake of their safety), no privateshownings for critics, and no press interviews. Why? Because no one likes them.

Only preteens who refuse to watch something that made sense, they sit brain dead refusing to use their brain.

If they keep this up, they will be more wanted than Cuban drug lords.
I will be famous:) Till then I'll prove how ridiculous hollywood is.
Back to Top
aqua mailman View Drop Down
Berry New Comer
Berry New Comer


Joined: September 01 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 15 		Post Options Post Options   Quote aqua mailman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 26 2010 at 3:39pm
Okay, I know TLA is going to win Worst Picture, but that is such a boring choicE! All thatis is lame action movie with no potential. VS had potetntial, because Twilight is horrible! But they had to give it to Seltzberg!!! In my opinion, this film has no equal!!!
Back to Top
oiram View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: June 28 2010
Location: America
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1117 		Post Options Post Options   Quote oiram Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 26 2010 at 4:02pm
Actually, both had potential, but were given to the wrong people.
Originally posted by aqua mailman

Okay, I know TLA is going to win Worst Picture, but that is such a boring choicE! All thatis is lame action movie with no potential. VS had potetntial, because Twilight is horrible! But they had to give it to Seltzberg!!! In my opinion, this film has no equal!!!


Elizabeth Hartman and Judith Barsi are much more talented and beautiful than Scarlett Johansson and Chloe Grace Moretz. Fact.
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4824 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 26 2010 at 4:12pm
Why do you say it was "given" to them?

This reminds me:If a parody ever gets nominated for other awards,would it be nominated for original or adapted script?Parodies take other plots and sometimes use elements from other plots,but is it directly based on another media?
http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com
Back to Top
BurnHollywoodBurn View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 03 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3557 		Post Options Post Options   Quote BurnHollywoodBurn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 26 2010 at 4:50pm
Originally posted by Areyouserious?

By the looks of it, "Seltzerberg" are scared someone will figure them out. They "tried" to hide the production of this, there was no premiere ( I'm sure for the sake of their safety), no privateshownings for critics, and no press interviews. Why? Because no one likes them.

Only preteens who refuse to watch something that made sense, they sit brain dead refusing to use their brain.
You speak the truth.
The Four Horsemen of the Moviepocalypse: uncalled for sequels/remakes/reboots, 3-D surcharges, untalented "celebrities", and anything with Michael Bay's name attached to it.
Back to Top
Vheid View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: December 10 2010
Location: Utrecht
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 979 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Vheid Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: December 27 2010 at 8:51am
I would say adapted but I am not sure.

Originally posted by Vits

Why do you say it was "given" to them?

This reminds me:If a parody ever gets nominated for other awards,would it be nominated for original or adapted script?Parodies take other plots and sometimes use elements from other plots,but is it directly based on another media?
Back to Top
aqua mailman View Drop Down
Berry New Comer
Berry New Comer


Joined: September 01 2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 15 		Post Options Post Options   Quote aqua mailman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 02 2011 at 8:54am

I consider it a remake of Twilight. Kinda like how Air Plane was a remake of the 70's disaster flick "Terror in the Sky".(and that is the ONLY thing that VS and Airpane have in common!!!)
Back to Top
Vits View Drop Down
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum
RAZZIE® Inner Sanctum


Joined: February 01 2010
Location: Chile
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4824 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Vits Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 02 2011 at 10:33am
I remember EPIC MOVIE was up for "Worst Rip-Off",but that's only because a parody is closer of being a rip-off that a remake.Neverthelss,parodies could have adapted scripts.
http://vits-ingthemovies.blogspot.com
Back to Top
Deepanshu View Drop Down
Berry New Comer
Berry New Comer


Joined: January 25 2011
Location: india
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5 		Post Options Post Options   Quote Deepanshu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: January 25 2011 at 7:59pm
You have exceeded the number of posts permitted in the time span...  
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 4567>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down