Given That It's Seltzerberg It's SURE to SUCK!!

The concensus is in, and it appears that, although it's bad, it's better than the other 4 Seltzer-Berg movies...though that's saying not much,isn't it? 

Sacha co-wrote the movie.

Every movie has at least one flaw, right? Whatever flaws BORAT has, they can't be related to the script, since there's wasn't much of a script.  

"Retarded" is putting it mildly regarding Tom Green's "humor."  

Yes, it would be ironic! But if "Last FartBender" has any say in the matter, it'll be a sweep!

As much as I disliked this film, it really wouldn't be funny if it got acting nominations, because the strong point in the film (yes, there was actually something good in the film) is that Lanter and Proske played (or mocked) Pattison and Stewert's mannerisms really, really well -- to the point that even some critics said they played the characters better than the actors in the Twilight series themselves! I was really impressed by Proske, especially. She's a promising actress, even though this is her big screen debut.  

I'll give this film some credit, it got some good Twilight jabs in. It's the directors' best films...but that's not saying much...

I'm looking for numbers here... I see that it MADE $12.2m (for not calling it Vampire Movie), does anyone have any idea on the budget? I think the others used to be about $20m, and I'm guessing they gave them less for this one, since it's been awhile, which means they'd have less to make up. It's really depressing to me to think that they'll be able to keep doing these movies. I really want this to fail, or at least get them straight-to-DVD.
I went to see Scott Pilgrim the other day with a friend of mine, and a friend of hers, and he was like, "I wanna see that. It's gonna be stupid but it mocks the movies I hate the most", referring to the Twilights. Is that ALL it takes to make money these days? Find something that's popular to one group, but disliked by those outside said group, and make a movie about it that includes a number of other pointless pop culture references, and if I know my Seltzerberg, have them get hurt in some way? I mean, seriously, if I could get a $10m dollar loan to make and advertise this movie, I could do this. Anyone could. These guys are millionaires by making the most pedestrian of entertainment. I'm reading Wealth of Nations, the capitalist bible, at the moment, and he talks about allotting higher pay to entertainers, to be paid for their talent... What does it say about our economy if you can make millions of dollars and have no talent?

Okay, I wouldn't pay money to see a movie just because it mocks Michael Bay, especially if I knew the writers/directors have a track record of being just as bad at their craft as Bay is. Kinda like Uwe Boll saying his stuff is bad, but Bay and Eli Roth are worse, etc. So I find this whole idea of people thinking "I know it's going to be stupid, but it mocks the movie I hate most, so I'll pay money to see it anyway" to be as retarded as Tom Green's sense of humor. Sadly, it's working, so Seltzerberg knew what they were doing here.